Malcolm McLaren R.I.P. 

Like a lot of people, I’m still coming to terms with the news of Malcolm McLaren’s death. Without him, there would have been no British Punk, and no most of us in our present form. Sure, something would have occurred in 1977, but it would have been a slightly sharper Pub Rock, without the art, the danger and the depth. McLaren wanted to shake up the English as hard as he could, and – thanks to the talent and courage of the Sex Pistols – he succeeded beyond his wildest dreams. His legacy will be discussed and assimilated during the months to come, but in the meantime I’ll leave you with an excerpt from the interview I did with him for England’s Dreaming in summer 1989. He’s talking about a possible movie script that ties into his managerial obsessions:

Malcolm McLaren in Cash from Chaos shirt, 1976

‘I want to make the first real truly, gangster movie, along the lines of Long Good Friday, within the context of rock’n'roll. Doing it like Once Upon A Time In America, and doing that whole robber baron trip, from the outskirts of Wolverhampton to London to the big world, the big toughie going to America and acting the big toughie and getting away with millions of pounds and landing in Lichtenstein with further problems and winding up somewhere else in some gigantic wonderful tragedy, a Danton-Robespierre of rock’n'roll history set from the point of view of the London thug entrepreneur, gay managerial circuit. Larry Parnes meets Peter Grant meets Brian Epstein meets Brian Jones meets Tom Watkins.

‘Grant is the core, and he’s a most magnificent character. He’s a Faustian, in a sense, and there’s a fabulous movie there. It’s something that people have touched upon in the odd rock’n'roll almanac, but not given it the true gangsterism, because they can’t associate rock’n'roll with the Richardson Gang. But we can, and we can do it in a gallant way. Just as America made The Godfather, and made the Mafia heroic and interesting and intriguing, something that everyone was obsessed by’.

‘Rock’n'roll has always been treated in a kitschy, campy, happy-go-lucky or silly, looking upon it as some dreadful tragedy. They haven’t looked at it as tough, hard-nosed gangsterism with style. Performance got a little like it, but I think Performance did it in a 60s idiom, but we want to talk about that it ran from ’55 to ’76 to ’85 or whatever. Something that ran the gamut, that gives us a genuine trail. Once Upon a Time in America‘.

Steve Jones and Malcolm McLaren

You were starting to do that epic myth with the Swindle, weren’t you?

‘Well, the Sex Pistols was more us preventing the whole thing from turning into a dreadful tragedy, and turning it into a fantastic rock’n'roll enigma. That’s what we tried to do, to lie incredibly. We did it quite successfully. Under psychoanalysis, it would probably come out that I was living out my childhood, which is in some respects true, but that’s not what we really cared about at the time. What we were concerned about at the time was just fucking running riot, man. The irresponsible nature of it all was the key to it, and once people started becoming responsible… we prevented it becoming responsible for as long as we could hold out. You never wanted to be part of the New Wave, rock’n'roll liberal tradition, looking like you were doing good things. I never believed that was behind Eddie Cochran, or Elvis Presley. Elvis Presley was a punk rocker, and so was Gene Vincent. So was Marilyn Monroe. So was anybody who was irresponsible and lived their lives in a way that you felt bigger bolder and better than you could. They were punks, they were anti-establishment, and they were gods. Marilyn Monroe today is bigger than ever, and so is Sid Vicious. I don’t see Johnny Rotten in the Lower East Side on a t-shirt. I see Sid Vicious all the bloody time. That’s got to be the difference’.

‘Rotten thought the Sex Pistols were his but the Sex Pistols were nobody’s. If they had any relationship, they had it with Reginald Bosanquet, who came in and bought black rubber knickers from Jordan in the shop, and went on News At Ten wearing them, and when he gave a slight smile, Jordan was supposed to believe it was for her. He was subversive, he was drunk, he was the guy that we all thought was a punk, giving out News At Ten. He was the direct relationship to the SEX shop, in turn a great relationship with the group themselves. It wasn’t the group themselves, it was everybody who was in the path of the media, or had a sense of power that we would consider gods. Old women consider those newscasters gods. We considered him a poor geezer, when he used to come in every morning and give us flowers for Jordan. We loved this guy, even though he was often so drunk he could hardly speak, he was red-faced, dreadfully infatuated with Jordan, and he couldn’t give a shit, and he was a wonderful, wonderful character. It was that character which was part of the SEX shop, of which the Sex Pistols were also a part’.

That sign said, in those big pink sponge letters, ginormous letters, making you think that this is not just another shop on the King Road, selling some third rate St Martin’s fashion school designs, this was a shop selling things you would normally be sending for, mail order, from the small ads of the Observer, and getting it back in a brown paper bag, you didn’t have to think in such a voyeuristic fashion. You could come in and buy it first-hand.

Didn’t Steve have that attitude as well?

Yeah, because Steve was a street kid. If it wasn’t for Steve there wouldn’t have been any group. Steve was the kid that was constantly thieving out of my shop, the one I had to constantly rally behind, and grab, and ultimately, through that grabbing, there was some fatal eye contact. It was like Fagin to the Artful Dodger. You thought, here’s another rogue. Less articulate, but can certainly run faster. It was a character that you couldn’t do other than admire and like. I was seduced by him. It was like Larry Parnes looking at Billy Fury, except that I didn’t go to bed with him. That was the only real difference. You had this marvellous, secret eye contact. You didn’t have to talk about Whistler, or Wilde, or TS Eliot, or Gene Vincent. You didn’t have to talk about any of those things, there was just a sense of understanding. That’s what kept me afloat in that whole gang. It was that. We always went back to it, whether it was the Anarchy in the UK tour, or pissed off in America, you went back and sat next to Steve Jones, and it was alright.’

* The photos that accompany this blog were taken by John Tiberi, aka Boogie – who worked with McLaren from 1977 to 1979 – during the filming of “The Great Rock’n Roll Swindle”. They will be featured in a great new book he is planning which will include his Sex Pistols photographs, many of which have never been seen. For more details, go to: www.johntiberi.com

R.I.P. Ballard, Seabrook 

High Rise, cover

Two recent deaths have prompted me to re-read the work of the authors concerned. J.G.Ballard’s death made national news, which was both impressive and deserved for such a great writer. I met him in late summer 1978, when I interviewed him for Search & Destroy magazine – run by V.Vale out of San Francisco (http://www.researchpubs.com). It was a hot day, and my drive down the M3 was sound-tracked by Siouxsie and the Banshees’ cool, malevolent “The Scream”. I missed the turn-off for Shepperton, and arrived late and flustered, but Ballard couldn’t have been kinder or more stimulating. It was my first non-musician interview, and I had a great time. This was a great period for science fiction and Ballard was at the cutting edge, describing an alternative present that was unfolding before your very eyes. His influence on popular culture was considerable, even then: published in 1975, “High Rise” (see picture) predicated much punk iconography while “Crash” explicitly informed the perfect electronic single by the Normal (Daniel Miller), “Warm Leatherette”. The flip – “TVOD” – also partook of Ballardian techno-barbarism. Vale published the interview – which will be available soon – in Search & Destroy Issue 10, and became such a convert that he later published two issues of Re/Search magazine, numbers 8/9 as a perfect bound special on “J.G.Ballard”, as well as an edition of “The Atrocity Exhibition” (1991) and “J.G.Ballard: Conversations” (2005).

A couple of months ago, I was told of David Seabrook’s death, which came as a shock: for much of last year I’d been in regular touch with him about his new book, an examination of the life and highly dubious death of Beatles’ lawyer David Jacobs. With his customary dogged tenacity, Seabrook was beginning to uncover a true Sixties darkside story: the real “Performance” if you like, mixing homosexuality (illegal until summer 1967), blackmail, organised crime, the music industry and the most famous pop stars on the planet. He had very little material to begin with: Jacobs is usually granted a line or two in most Beatles’ histories, even though he was at the centre of much Beatle business and the life of manager Brian Epstein – for instance, he cleared out the Chapel Street house after Epstein’s August 1967 overdose. When I interviewed Beatles publicist and Apple PR Derek Taylor in 1997, he mentioned Jacobs in passing: Brian ‘had a vast and successful group of homosexual friends. Including Nat Weiss, David Jacobs… that was a very dodgy business, it ended so badly, and I don’t know why he hanged himself…he had no innocence at all left, David Jacobs. I had lunch with Cecil Beaton, and I felt the same about him: hard, mean-spirited, ambitious, cruel and vindictive man.’

Jack of Jumps, book cover

It remains to be seen whether Seabrook’s work will be completed, but in the meantime I went back to “Jack of Jumps” (2006), his exhaustive account of the ‘nude murders’ that gripped the capital in the mid sixties: between 1959 and 1965, eight prostitutes were murdered and dumped in various locations around West London. The killer was never caught. I can remember as a child seeing the photos of the dead women in the papers at the time, and over 40 years on, they still have the power to chill. “Jack of Jumps” has a relentless, grim momentum as Seabrook, relying on police documents and his own research, maps out a whole underworld ignored by almost all histories of the decade. My one reservation would be Seabrook’s lack of empathy with the difficult, dangerous and often compulsive lives led by the victims, but he was certainly onto something with his Sixties Darkside obsession – and the David Jacobs book could have been his masterpiece. The only other person currently working in this area is Stewart Home, and I can thoroughly recommend his fictional memoir about his mother, Julia Callan-Thompson, “Tainted Love” (2005). He also has a great blog

A final thought, counter to the revisionist, neo-con view of the Sixties, from J.G.Ballard’s autobiography, “Miracles of Life”: ‘the 1960′s were a far more revolutionary time than younger people now realise, and most people assume that English life has always been much as it is today, except for mobile phones, emails and computers. But a social revolution took place, as significant in many ways as that of the post-war Labour government. Pop music and the space age, drugs and Vietnam, fashion and consumerism merged together into an interesting and volatile mix’.